Tuesday, December 15, 2009

Why do US based companies have the exclusive right in Iraqi oil resources?

Is that the ultimate proof that Iraq is a slave state of the US?Why do US based companies have the exclusive right in Iraqi oil resources?
I dont believe that, China, Italy , France and Russia had previous contracts done under Saddam's rule.





In fact Iraq would be a slave state of USA, France, Italy, Russia and China.


This guarantees the instability of any Iraqi Government.Iraqi people will always see these governments as puppets and this will fuel class struggle.


What we want.Why do US based companies have the exclusive right in Iraqi oil resources?
Not exclusive US. BP is British and Shell (Shell is the US based part of the Royal Shell Company) I think is Swedish. So 2 (Mobil and Exxon) of the 4. And I'm sure that Bush convoluted reasoning there is that we killed more people so we deserve more of the oil.
No, the original logic was that if the US did most of the heavy lifting in Iraq, then US companies should get the lion's share of the booty. Guess poor old England got stiffed by Bushco.
Iraq is intended to be a US colony now.


permanent bases have been set up all over %26amp; eventually they want americans to be able to live there.
Yes, because they deserve it.





Who do you want to have the oil? Iran.





Is that you, Obama? Or you, Osama?
They do not. U.S. oil companies have oil leases with Iraq, mostly negotiated with the former regime.
The latest Iraqi contract to develop oil reserves went to a French company, Total.

No comments:

Post a Comment